Idea Spark: Voice of the Brand Pt. 2: What is Your Brand’s Voice?
This Idea Spark blog post is the result of the discussion during our Friday morning Creativity Coffee. If you’d like to join us (in person or via web/phone conference), please sign up here. There’s no charge or obligation. We just love ideas and open discussion!
During our previous Creativity Coffee, we continued the discussion about online communities by drilling down into the Voice of the Brand—Who is Talking to determine whether or not it matters if the actual person behind a brand’s social account(s) matters to the consumers who are interacting with the brand.
In this week’s discussion, we continued the conversation by going even deeper and discussing what the voice of the brand should be. What is the tone and personality of a brand’s social “voice” via their Twitter, Facebook and other social accounts? How do they determine that voice? Here are the ideas that came out of our discussion.
- The brand’s voice is not necessarily a reflection of the company culture—but it could be.
- A brand is trying to appeal to the demographic of its target customer. That demographic may not be reflected in the demographics of the company’s employees or its environment and culture.
- However, some brands are very tied to their corporate culture (e.g. Zappos). The voice of the brand is very personal to that culture (Tony) and therefore is driven by that culture.
- Brand voice is closely tied to social strategy.
- Is the social strategy tied to a particular campaign? A brand image that already exists (mascot, spokesperson)? The social marketing strategy for the brand and the purpose of the particular social account should drive the way the brand approaches its voice. Is the strategy to drive content? Is it to engage in social discussion? Provide customer service? All these approaches may require a different voice—informative, friendly, professional, funny, helpful, provocative, evocative—and a different account for the particular purpose/use.
- Personalizing the brand versus personifying a brand.
- Personalizing. Brands that are the most successful on the social web are speaking TO individuals. They are humanizing the brand and bringing the discussion to a one to one conversation. They are making consumers feel, “They care about me…they listen to me…they make me feel special.”
- Personifying. This is very different to attaching a personna to the brand; that is, identifying a specific person to a brand’s social identity (Dunkin’ Dave). As we discussed in Part 1 of this conversation, this can be disadvantageous to a brand if/when that employee leaves the company; the social equity that the particular employee has created walks with that employee.
- How should a brand determine their voice and tone?
- Marketing Strategy. The brand voice should support the mission of the company and/or the brand marketing strategy.
- Social Role and Strategy. The brand voice for each social account should reflect the role and goals of the account (customer support, deals only, specific product, etc.) as well as the social and marketing strategy for the brand. Is the point to inform (e.g @breakingnews)? Engage individuals (e.g. @starbucks)? Provide better service (e.g. @comcastcares)? The voice used to communicate needs to reflect that strategy and role of the account to the brand as well as the voice of the consumers the brand is trying to engage. @comcastcares will have a different voice than @burtonsnowboard.
- Brand Identity. The tone of the brand’s social voice also needs to be in line with the overall brand identity. It can be driven by a particular marketing campaign (e.g. @crunchiscalling) to promote brand messaging and overall brand impressions. But how does this impact the brand in the long term? Is brand impression enough?
Our next Idea Spark Creativity Coffee covers the larger issue of Who Owns Social Marketing in a Company? Is it Marketing? PR? Customer Service? If there are multiple accounts and owners, how do they interact? Who drives the strategy? Please join the conversation!

During our previous Creativity Coffee, we continued the discussion about online communities by talking about the
The last Creativity Coffee discussion centered around
Businesses are looking to engage consumers talking about topics that relate to their markets. Some companies have taken the initiative to host their own online forums and communities to enable peer-driven support, to collect customer feedback and to drive customer engagement and loyalty. But today’s public social networks have enabled individuals to create and participate in loosely organized, organically formed social communities surrounding topics of individual interests. Should brands and businesses try to form their own communities or join the existing and new user-created social communities? This was the topic of our Idea Spark Creativity Coffee. Here are the ideas that came out of the discussion.
Last week’s Creativity Coffee focused on
It’s no big news that more and more businesses are diving into social marketing—500 million Facebook users are just too hard to pass up! But aside from the obvious audience potential, businesses need to set clear objectives for their social marketing activities in order to develop measurable value for their effort. What are the core business objectives for social marketing? What should businesses be striving to accomplish?
The last two Creativity Coffee discussions centered around
The last Creativity Coffee discussion centered around 


