Idea Spark: Convergence of Email and Social Marketing
This Idea Spark blog post is the result of the discussion during our Friday morning Creativity Coffee. If you’d like to join us (in person or via web/phone conference), please sign up here. There’s no charge or obligation. We just love ideas and open discussion!
Last Friday’s Creativity Coffee topic centered around email and social marketing. Is it complementary? Does one size fit all?
Ben & Jerry’s recently announced that it would be discontinuing email newsletters in favor of updates and offers on social media. eMarketer just reported findings by Crossview that of consumers surveyed, 37% preferred to get promotions via email, 18% via mobile, and only 9% via social media. Is Ben & Jerry’s leaving many loyal customers without a valued way to connect? Should they have considered balancing email and social media? How do email and social marketing play together? What are their points of intersection and points of departure?
Here are some ideas and discussion points from the conversation.
- Email and social are complementary marketing channels
- Email lists can drive people to engage in direct communications via social channels.
- Social channels can drive people to accept permission-based email marketing newsletters and updates.
- But how are these channels different? Should the same rules apply? Are the methods converging?
- Email and Social Media differ as marketing systems.
- Different channel, different message? Sometimes.
- Some people desire to publish different content on different channels—using unique content for each channel. This works in some chases, but is hard to manage and maintain.
- Other people publish the same content across all channels (e.g. blog post via email, link to blog post and topical info via social media). This ensures that all contacts get the same broadcast message.
- It’s hard to say what’s right or wrong; it depends upon the overall marketing goals and strategy and how each channel plays into that strategy.
- Personalization is key—you don’t want to bombard the same person multiple times with the same message across multiple channels unless that’s what they’ve asked for.
- It also helps to identify the types of messaging/communications you send out, and then determine the right channel for each. Create a matrix to help you define a standard way of communicating your messages. Once you do this, people will come to rely on your particular style of messaging.
- Example: CopyBlogger. Copyblogger is a valuable and insightful blog on marketing and copywriting for online marketers. They update their content daily, and they blast the same messaging across all channels. But people rely on that style and know that they can “catch up” with the content in a variety of ways.
- Example: Chris Brogan. Chris blogs often and is very social. His blog is useful and valuable and frequent. But his email newsletter is fairly infrequent. People know that when they receive an email newsletter from Chris, it will be very informative and is worth opening and reading. Thus, his open rates for email will be high because his content and channel strategy has helped set a level of trust and expectation that people can rely upon.
- Robots are not social.
- Automated messages via email are desirable (e.g. auto responder upon subscribe).
- Automated messages via social channels are NOT desirable. Social media is conversational. An automated message tells a contact that you’re not interested in engaging in a conversation with them.
- The permission-based (opt-in) marketing rules that apply to email MUST also be applied to social marketing.
- If someone Follows you on Twitter or Likes your page on Facebook, they are opening up the possibility of being exposed to your content and to engage with you in a conversation.
- This first step of engagement does NOT equal permission to market to those contacts!
- You MUST get explicit permission to send marketing messages over social channels. Otherwise, you are sending SPAM.
- People perceive a higher level of intimacy via social and mobile channels. Your use of those channels without explicit permission will break down any rust you’ve built with your contacts AND may get your marked as a SPAMMER with Twitter, Facebook and mobile operators. Your accounts can (and will) be shut down.
- Email and social marketing “lists” are currently in separate silos (JitterJam note: Not when you’re using JitterJam!)
- Merging those silos is imperative if you’re going to have an effective and productive multi-channel marketing capability.
- As stated above, getting permission to market is very personal; you must get permission for each channel.
| Social Media | |||
| Frequency | Daily, weekly and/or monthly | Depends on intent—from constant (customer service) to hourly or daily | |
| Usage | Message-based. Composed messages with specific targeted messaging & promotions, content and calls to action. | Conversational. 1-to-1 dialogue, content to share, direct and broadcast messaging, promotions & calls to action. | |
| Opt-In | Yes. People who opt-in expect (and welcome) promotional messages. | No. People may Follow/Like your social accounts, but it is NOT an explicit opt-in to receive promotional messages. | |
| Sticky? | Yes. Your messages are stored in the recipient’s inbox and accessed at their leisure. | Some. Your public messages are fleeting and are seen if your “audience” is watching. Your directed messages (@, DM, FB msg) are accessed at a recipient’s leisure. | |
| State | Passive. People see email as a passive medium. They get to it when they have time/if it interests them. | Active. People see social as an active medium. “Being part of the conversation” where a conversation is live, now, real time. |
| Msg Type | Blog | |||||||
| Type 1 | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Type 2 | X | X | ||||||
| Type 3 | X | |||||||
| Type 4 | X | X |
As you can see, we have pretty lively discussions early on a Friday morning!
How are you using email and social marketing? Are you applying the same rules for permission-based marketing to social as you have with email? How are the response and activity rates changing with the inclusion of social in the marketing mix? Was Ben & Jerry’s right to ditch email for social? Let us know what you think!
And don’t forget, you’re welcome to join the conversation!



